Party in the Blitz by Elias Canetti
From the Reviews:
"Doch was im neuen Buch, ungefiltert durch die strengen Redigate, denen Canetti
seine eigenen Texte zu unterwerfen pflegte, zu finden ist, ist ohne Beispiel.
(...) So gibt es gleich mehrere Kapitel, die nach zwei, drei Absätzen noch
einmal neu zu beginnen scheinen, gibt es monotone Wiederholungen gerade der
funkelndsten Beobachtungen, die dadurch ihren Glanz einbüßen. Dessenungeachtet
ist Party im Blitz ein grandioses Buch, denn die nahezu brutale Kraft von
Canettis Zugriff auf seine Umgebung überträgt sich auf den Leser." - Andreas
Platthaus, Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung
"Despite carelessnesses (...) they are splendidly entertaining. Canetti's method
is to string together small scenes, like beads, into a continuing story." -
Peter Conradi, The Guardian
"In these English portraits, Canetti briefly lives up to his model, John Aubrey.
Read Party in the Blitz for them; forget Iris Murdoch." - Carole Angier, The
Independent
"However, there is much beautiful, funny and sensitive writing here as well. It
is an odd piece of luck that Canetti did not have the chance to work over the
manuscript and adjust his own portrait in it as he did in the lofty chronicles
of his days in Germany. His phrasing is often wonderfully poised, and it is very
well caught in Michael Hamburger's vigorous translation." - Tim Martin,
Independent on Sunday
"Despite Johanna Canetti's devoted care for the text and the labors of Florindo
Tarreghetta, whom Ms. Canetti commissioned to transcribe three separate
manuscripts, the book is plainly the work of an old man in a hurry." - John
Banville, The Nation
"Wir lesen ein Dokument. Doch wäre sich Canetti untreu geworden, wenn er nun die
Tonart des Denkens und Schreibens ins Ruhige, gar Versöhnliche moduliert hätte.
Jedenfalls gibt sich das Buch -- aus dem Nachlass gewiss mit Sorgfalt, aber
freilich ohne das Plazet des Dichters kompiliert -- wie nur eh und je streitbar,
mitunter rabiat, und insofern ist es vollkommen authentisch." - Martin Meyer,
Neue Zürcher Zeitung
"What we gave here are mostly drafts, more or less finished, and jottings. (...)
(O)ne cannot read the book without echoing the opinion that Canetti was a
horrible man." - Frank Kermode, The New Republic
"Party in the Blitz (...) possesses an immediacy due as much to its rather
ragged state, compounded as it is of diary jottings, character sketches, and
drafts of chapters, as to the events it evokes." - Eric Ormsby, The New York Sun
"Here is the proof that he was too pleased with himself to be truly perceptive
about others. (...) (H)e wrote a book fit to serve every writer in the world as
a hideous, hilarious example of the tone to avoid when the ego, faced with the
certain proof of its peripheral importance, loses the last of its inhibitions."
- Clive James, The New York Times Book Review
"Despite the bitchiness, and because of it, Canetti proves himself a pre-emiment
authority of that perennially curious social gathering, the London literary
evening, his thesis a nice little coda to his life's work on Crowds and Power.
And you are left in no doubt that he was, as he well knew, always the life and
soul of the party." - Tim Adams, The Observer
"Oddly, movingly, Canetti's memoir becomes the record of a search for that dimly
remembered country." - Anthony Giardina, San Francisco Chronicle
"Canetti’s portrait of England is frozen in time, as most such portraits of
national character tend to be. It took me a while to think what it most closely
recalled. Then I realised that it was just like The British Character, that
series of drawings by Pont of Punch first collected in book form in 1938." -
Ferdinand Mount, The Spectator
"It might occur to readers to wonder why, if Murdoch was so awful, Canetti
bothered to pursue the affair. But that would be to treat his account seriously,
whereas it is clearly just an outflow of venom and envy. (...) With writing of
that quality, mediated through Michael Hofmann’s versatile translation, you need
no further incentive to go on reading Canetti, for all his self-pity and
paranoia." - John Carey, Sunday Times
"As utterly captivating as the pen portraits of Party in the Blitz are -- and
arresting and convincing much of its social commentary -- it is hard to resist
remarking, "takes one to know one"." - Alex Clark, The Telegraph
"It is easy to dislike him, and tempting to mock him as a little tin god, but
there is something about his bristling intensity that always makes you read on."
- John Gross, The Telegraph
"(A) compellingly readable book." - Ritchie Robertson, Times Literary Supplement
"At the very least, Party in the Blitz, for all its uneasy mix of wisdom and
waywardness, should lead adventurous readers back to this learned, idiosyncratic
mind, and to his many books" - Michael Dirda, The Washington Post
"Nein, das ist kein angenehmes Buch. Gleichwohl ein hochinteressantes. (...)
Abgesehen von solchen Einwänden bietet Party im Blitz außerordentliches
Lektürevergnügen. Wie bereits in Canettis viel gerühmter Memoirentrilogie haben
wir es da vor allem mit einer Porträtgalerie zu tun. Die Porträtierten werden
unter seinem Blick zu Charakteren und Typen. Zusammen ergeben sie gleichsam die
Anthropologie und Soziologie eines Landes und mehr: die Summe einer Epoche." -
Ulrich Weinzierl, Die Welt
Please note that these ratings solely represent the complete review's biased
interpretation and subjective opinion of the actual reviews and do not claim to
accurately reflect or represent the views of the reviewers. Similarly the
illustrative quotes chosen here are merely those the complete review
subjectively believes represent the tenor and judgment of the review as a whole.
We acknowledge (and remind and warn you) that they may, in fact, be entirely
unrepresentative of the actual reviews by any other measure.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The complete review's Review:
Party im Blitz is the fragmentary memoir of Elias Canetti's "English years", at
least the early ones, from the late 1930s to the 1950s. Canetti wrote these
recollections in the early 1990s, and they have now posthumously been edited
together (by Kristian Wachinger) in a book that is obviously unfinished, but
still of considerable interest. There's even something to be said for the
absence of the final polish Canetti himself might have put on the text, as his
sense of desperation in trying to retrieve, order, and relate these memories
comes across in places, making for an interesting glimpse of the author as an
old man, trying to hold onto parts of the past (and stave off the future).
Canetti isn't even entirely certain how to present the material. He mention's
John Aubrey's Brief Lives as a model:
wie ledienschaftlich gern würde ich es ihm gleich tun, denn ich könnte es, doch,
eben doch hätte ich das Zeug
how passionately much I'd like to pull of what he did, because I could, yes, I
still have the mettle
It is this model, more or less, that he did choose, rather than the far more
straightforward (and in-depth) narrative that marked the earlier
autobiographical trilogy describing his youth and his becoming a writer. Party
im Blitz is presented in short sections, and most of them are 'brief lives':
vignettes, impressions, and descriptions of encounters with many of the people
Canetti met in England (along with a few more general sections). It is an
unusual selection: for one, many of the most significant figures of his English
years (including wife Veza, and many of his fellow emigrants with whom he
remained in close contact during those years) remain almost entirely peripheral.
And even those who are considered more closely are shown more in snapshot style:
representative (or exceptional) episodes, or aspects of their lives the focus,
rather than a more general description of them, or of Canetti's relationship
with them.
It is, specifically, a picture of the England of that era that emerges (and
Canetti also points out, in some amusing anti-Thatcher tirades, that it is an
era that has been lost -- as is the specific English character that made it up (which
he tries to capture and convey using these exemplars)). There are sections
devoted to a few emigrants -- including Franz Steiner and Oskar Kokoschka -- but
for the most part Canetti focusses on the English. He met an astonishing variety
of significant figures, and there are sections devoted to, among others:
Bertrand Russell, Enoch Powell, Herbert Read, Arthur Waley, Vaughan Williams, J.D.Bernal,
and Roland Penrose. Some he only met briefly, but even in just describing, for
example, T.S.Eliot from a distance he manages to evoke the time (and offer
fascinating insight into his own character, as his reactions are often visceral
and blunt, with little effort (or ability) to hide his antipathy).
From the Milburns, in whose house Canetti and wife Veza lived (with separate
bedrooms, he takes care to note) when they moved out of London during the war,
to a good deal about patron and close friend, Sir Aymer Maxwell (and his Bentley),
there are some generous portraits in the book (though even here Canetti makes
note of idiosyncrasies and failures -- though more gently than when discussing
most). There are amusing anecdotes: how he came to meet Bertrand Russell (through
a Mrs.Phillimore, a close friend of Russell's first wife) or some of the parties
he attends (including the party during the Blitz of the title). Among the most
interesting chapters is that on Arthur Waley. Waley was not just an orientalist,
but also read German; hearing that the main character in Canetti's first novel,
the then still untranslated Auto da Fé, was a sinologist he managed to get a
copy of the book, and so: "Der Zufall wollte es, daß Arthur Waley der einzige
Engländer war, der etwas von mir gelesen hatte" ("As it happened, Arthur Waley
was the only Englishman who had read anything of mine").
And then there's Iris Murdoch. One of the longer sections focusses on her, and
it is the most detailed of the portraits in the book, one of the few attempts to
describe a person fully. And Canetti is not kind. He begins by mentioning he
just received Murdoch's most recent book, Metaphysics as a Guide to Morals
(1992), and spent a few hours ("leider" -- "unfortunately" -- he adds) leafing
through it, after which he can't hold himself back:
Mein widerwillen gegen sie hat sich so gesteigert, daß ich hier einiges sagen
muß.
My aversion to her has intensified so, that there are some things I have to say
here.
He dismisses this particular book, and then continues his assault. He doesn't
think much of Murdoch as a thinker ("Sie ist passionierte Schülerin, und zwar
eine, die am liebsten Systeme erlernt" ("She is a passionate Student;
specifically, one who likes to learn systems")). He suggests she collected
figures -- men, especially, each of a particular type -- and used them and what
they offered her in her fiction. The Oxford-sameness to her fictions bothers
Canetti (and he suggests one might call her the "Oxford ragout"), as does the
cerebral distance from actual feeling.
Canetti also describes his affair with Murdoch, a truly ugly account. From its
beginning, after Murdoch repeatedly came to Canetti after the death of Franz
Steiner, to their unusual love-making (which Canetti even here, some four
decades later, seems puzzled about (with good reason)), it is a truly odd
relationship. But it is of interest, in revealing facets of both these authors'
characters.
Parties also figure throughout the book. Canetti notes: "Nirgends fühlte ich
mich verlassener und trostloser als auf Parties" ("Nowhere did I feel more
forsaken and disconsolate than at parties"). Nevertheless, he attends quite a
few -- and observes with bewildered fascination how they function. They are
typically English, where space is maintained, names preferably incomprehensibly
mumbled, conversation of a limited and peculiar variety, and class and other
distinctions unclear. (At what he calls the most bizarre party he attended,
Christine Maxwell invited a mix of communists and high nobility, which Canetti
could not tell apart, even by their utterances.) All this is also part of the
distinctively English world he wants to convey -- a world also dominated by
varieties of haughtiness ("Hochmut") he tries to describe.
The book is more about a specific English era -- as perceived by Canetti -- than
his English years. The people he knew defined that era, representatives of a
variety of types. The more general considerations of England and that lost era
aren't fully worked out, but there a some interesting observations and ideas.
In many respects Party im Blitz is more social study than autobiography. It is,
unfortunately, unfinished, but it is well put together and does not feel
fragmentary. Almost all the sections are presented in Canetti's clear writing
style, and it reads well throughout. One wishes for more, but is glad for what
there is.
Jeremy Adler's afterword, and the annotations, are also helpful.